Artificial intelligence (AI) has assimilated into civilization by the year 2035. AI systems are used in a number of industries, including transportation, healthcare, and even the legal system. With the help of this technical development, productivity levels have never been higher, and new firms are expanding quickly. It has, however, also resulted in new difficulties.
Based on language cues, generative AI systems may write, produce graphics, and even produce computer code. A technology revolution that will transform governments, economy, and society officially begins with this. While previous waves of technology have brought both progress and disruption, AI offers a distinct challenge to the balance of power on the global scale.
In the world of digital media, technology companies have significantly increased their influence and power, and AI furthers this trend outside of the digital sphere. The complexity and rapidity of AI development make it challenging for governments to maintain compliance with pertinent laws. As a result, requests have been made for the creation of international governance frameworks for AI.
The issues presented by AI are now being addressed by policymakers all across the world. The “Hiroshima AI process” of the G-7 and the AI Act of the European Union are examples of forums that are working to synchronize AI governance. There have also been requests for a global AI regulatory watchdog. Politicians in the United States are becoming more and more aware of the necessity for regulatory action.
However, the distinctiveness of this technology is frequently overlooked in the present discussion on AI governance. AI cannot be managed in the same way as other technologies, and it is already changing how we think about global power. A new structure that puts technology companies at the table is required to effectively control AI.
Policymakers should set fundamental guidelines for AI regulation going forward, such as being cautious, nimble, inclusive, impermeable, and focused. These concepts can serve as the cornerstone for overlapping governance regimes that prioritize risk analysis and fact-based decision-making, avoid an arms race, and control the disruptive effects of AI.
The influence of AI in 2035 will depend on the decisions made by governments now. 2035 will unavoidably come. It is critical to reevaluate fundamental beliefs about the geopolitical system and develop a governing structure that is appropriate for this novel technology. With its exponential expansion and unanticipated powers, the AI power conundrum calls for a novel approach to address the issues it raises.
